Seasonal Prevalence and Host Preference of Some Medically Important Aedes Species of Doon Valley, India

  • Ritwik Mondal Department of Zoology, University of North Bengal, West Bengal, India.
  • N Pemola Devi Department of Zoology, D.B.S. (P.G.) College, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
  • Sajal Bhattacharya Department of Zoology, Asutosh College (University of Calcutta), Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Keywords: Aedes Species, Double Immunodiffusion, Blood Meal Analysis, Host Preference, Seasonal Prevalence


In the recent past, several outbreaks of mosquito-borne diseases in Dehradun city make it necessary for a comprehensive understanding of man-vector contacts, disease transmission and determination of appropriate resting sites for adult mosquitoes. The study was conducted within the periphery of Dehradun city in Doon valley, Uttarakhand state, India consisting of eight (08) locations namely Sahaspur, Premnagar, Raipur, Karanpur, Sahastradhara, Dudhli, Doiwala and Rani Pokhri with the objective to analyze and assess the seasonal prevalence and host choice of the mosquitoes with special reference to Aedes species. Among the eight locations of the current study, Raipur registered the highest mosquito abundance (17%) trailed by Sahaspur (16%) and Karanpur (15%). A low abundance of mosquitoes was registered conjointly from Doiwala and Rani Pokhri areas (9% from each area). In these areas, the profile plots of the 2-way ANOVA displayed the highest variation for the data collected from human habitations followed by bovine sheds, whereas the lowest recorded variation was from the poultry. With regards to seasonal prevalence, the highest mosquito abundance was registered during the monsoon followed by the postmonsoon. In provender analysis, a total of 1912 blood meals were collected for antibody test among which 1851 were found positive, with the highest reaction with human antisera (57.75%), followed by bovine antisera (21.34%) and pigs antisera (4.97%). Ae. aegypti had the highest Anthropophilic Index (A.I.) with 68.78%, followed by Ae. albopictus (64.89%) and Ae. vittatus (55.55%). However, Human Blood Predominance (H.B.P.) and Pure Human Blood Pervasiveness (P.H.B.P.) were found highest for Ae. albopictus with values 0.43 and 0.44 respectively. The results also show the seasonal prevalence and feeding habits of these vectors. This study would be helpful in formulating season-wise strategies for the control of Aedes vector mosquitoes in different eco-epidemiological situations.

How to cite this article:
Mondal R, Pemola Devi N, Bhattacharya S. Seasonal Prevalence and Host Preference of Some Medically Important Aedes Species of Doon Valley, India. J Commun Dis. 2021;53(3):96-103.



Author Biographies

Ritwik Mondal, Department of Zoology, University of North Bengal, West Bengal, India.

Assistant Professor,

Dept. of Zoology

University of North Bengal, West Bengal, India

N Pemola Devi, Department of Zoology, D.B.S. (P.G.) College, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.


Dept. of Zoology

D.B.S. (P.G.) College, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India

Sajal Bhattacharya, Department of Zoology, Asutosh College (University of Calcutta), Kolkata, West Bengal, India.


Department of Zoology,

Asutosh College (University of Calcutta),

Kolkata, West Bengal, India


Barraud PJ, Christophers SR. On a collection of Anopheles and Culicine mosquitoes from Siam. Rec

Malaria Sur India. 1931;2(2):269-89.

Chaves LF, Harrington LC, Keogh CL, Nguyen AM, Kitron UD. Blood feeding patterns of mosquitoes: random

or structured? Front Zool. 2010 Jan 21;7:3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Washino RK, Tempelis CH. Mosquito host blood meal identification: methodology and data analysis. Annu

Rev Entomol. 1983;28:179-201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Li CF, Lim TW, Han LL, Fang RA. Rainfall, abundance of Aedes aegypti and dengue infection in Selangor,

Malaysia. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1985 Dec;16(4):560-8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Okogun GRA, Nwoke BEB, Okera AN, Anosike JC, Esekhegbe AC. Epidemiological implications of the

preferences of breeding sites of mosquito species in Midwestern Nigeria. Ann Agric Environ Med.

;10(2):217-22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Perich MJ, Rocha NO, Castro AL, Alfaro AW, Platt KB, Solano T, Rowley WA. Evaluation of the efficacy

of lambda-cyhalothrin applied by three spray application methods for emergency control of Aedes

aegypti in Costa Rica. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2003 Mar;19(1):58-62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Eisen L, Beaty BJ. Innovative decision support and vector control approaches to control dengue. In vectorborne

diseases: understanding the environmental, human health and ecological connections. Washington,

DC, USA: Workshop Summary, The National Academies Press, 2008.

Boreham PFL, Garrett-Jones C. Prevalence of mixed blood meals and double feeding in a malaria vector

(Anopheles sacharoui) Favre. Bull World Health Organ. 1973 May;48(5):605-14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Ponlawat A, Harrington LC. Blood feeding patterns of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in Thailand. J Med

Entomol. 2005 Sep;42(5):844-9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Agrawal SK, Ali M. Multiple blood feeding behaviour of Culex quinquesfasciatus in Marendragarh city,

Chhattisgarh state, India. Glob. J. Multidiscip. Stud. 2015;4(03):23-30.

Kay BH, Boyd AM, Ryan PA, Hall RA. Mosquito feeding patterns and natural infection of vertebrates with Ross

River and Barmah Forest viruses in Brisbane, Australia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Mar;76(3):417-23. [PubMed]

[Google Scholar]

Garcia-Rejon JE, Blitvich BJ, Farfan-Ale JA, Loroño-Pino MA, Chim WA, Flores-Flores LF, Rosado-Paredes E,

Baak-Baak C, Perez-Mutul J, Suarez-Solis V, Fernandez- Salas I. Host-feeding preference of the mosquito, Culex

quinquefasciatus, in Yucatan State, Mexico. J Insect Sci. 2010;10:32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Barrera R, Amador M, Young G, Komar N. Mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) bloodmeal sources during a period

of West Nile virus transmission in Puerto Rico. J Med Entomol. 2011 May;48(3):701-4. [PubMed] [Google


Gananakumar S, Arunmani M, Dwarakanath SK. Blood meal analysis of a few mosquito species in Madurai

using double immunodiffusion technique. Proceedings of the second symposium on vectors and Vect. Bor.

Dis. 1997, p.169-175.

Jauhari RK, Singh RP, Singh S. Breeding and resting site of mosquitoes in the forested areas of Doon Valley.

Ind. J. Forestry. 1995;18(3):249-50.

Mahesh RK, Jauhari RK. Mosquito fauna of the forested areas of Doon valley, (UP) India. Entomon.

;28(2):185-90.17. Azmi SA, Das S, Chatterjee S. Seasonal prevalence and blood meal analysis of filarial vector Culex quinquefasciatus in coastal areas of Digha, West Bengal, India. J Vector Borne Dis. 2015 Sep;52(3):252-6.

[PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Service MW. Mosquito ecology: Field sampling methods. 2nd ed. Barking, UK, Elsevier Science Publishers. 1993, p.988.

Ouchterlony O, Nilson LA. Immunodiffusion and immune electrophoresis. Hand Book of Experimental

Immunology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. 1973, p.1-99.

Collins RT, Narasimham MV, Dhal KB, Mukherjee BP. Gel diffusion analysis of Anopheles blood meals from

malarious study villages of Orissa State, India. J Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 1991 Dec;7(4):595-603.

[PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Zar JH. Biostatistical analysis. 4th ed. New Delhi, India: Pearson Education (P) Ltd. (Indian Branch). 1999.

Sucharit S, Tumrasvin W, Vutikes S, Viraboonchai S. Interactions between larvae of Aedes aegypti and

Aedes albopictus in mixed experimental populations. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1978

Mar;9(1):93-7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Smith A, Weitz B. The feeding habits of Anopheles gambiae, with particular reference to subsidiary hosts.

Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1959 Dec;53:414-5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Tandon N, Ray S. Host feeding pattern of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in Kolkata India. Deng. Bull.

;24:117-20. [Google Scholar]

Scott TW, Clark GG, Lorenz LH, Amerasinghe PH, Reiter P, Edman JD. Detection of multiple blood feeding in Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) during a single gonotrophic cycle using a histologic technique. J Med Entomol. 1993 Jan;30(1):94-9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]