Larvicidal Activity of Phenylbutanoid Isolated from the Rhizome of Zingiber montanum (J. Koenig) against Aedes albopictus (Skuse) and Cx. quinquefasciatus Say

  • Abhisekh Subba Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of North Bengal, Siliguri, Darjeeling, West Bengal, India.
  • Dhiraj Saha Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of North Bengal, Siliguri, Darjeeling, West Bengal, India.
Keywords: Phenylbutanoid, Aedes, Culex, Larvicide, Isolation, Chemical Characterisation

Abstract

Introduction: Mosquito-borne infections are most prevalent in the northern districts of West Bengal, India. The public health administrator in this region relies heavily on synthetic insecticides, which has created
more challenges than solving problems. This study attempts to find ecofriendly, biodegradable, and effective botanicals against mosquitoes, especially Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus.
Methods: A preliminary screening study showed that the n-hexane extract of Zingiber montanum rhizome possessed potential larvicidal activity against mosquito larvae. Bioassay-guided fractionation led to
the isolation of bioactive phenylbutanoid which was characterised using 1H and 13C NMR and HRMS-TOF.
Results: The compound was identified as cis-1,2-Bis-[(E)-3,4- dimethoxystyryl]cyclobutane (DMSCB) by comparing with previously published data. The molecular ion of the compound was found to be 381.261 m/z with a molecular formula of C24H28O4. The compound was found to have LC50 values of 39.951 ppm and 58.178 ppm against Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae respectively.
Conclusions: Phenyl propanoids and terpenoids are known to possess some level of insecticidal activity but our studies show that phenylbutanoid, DMSCB, also possesses insecticidal activity. This implies that plants containing phenylbutanoid affect the overall insecticidal activity of an extract. Therefore, the outcome of our study suggests that the rhizome extract of Z. montanum has the potential to be used in field studies.

How to cite this article:
Subba A, Saha D. Larvicidal Activity of Phenylbutanoid Isolated from the Rhizome of Zingiber montanum (J. Koenig) against Aedes albopictus (Skuse) and Cx. quinquefasciatus Say. J Commun Dis. 2023;55(4):63-70.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24321/0019.5138.202357

References

Nagpal BN, Kalra NL. Malaria vectors of India. J Parasit Dis. 1997;21(1):105-12. [Google Scholar]

National Center for Vector Borne Diseases Control [Internet]. Diseases; 2020 [cited 2020 Feb 11]. Available

from: https://ncvbdc.mohfw.gov.in/index4.php?lang =1&level=0&linkid=407&lid=3683

Rai P, Bharati M, Subba A, Saha D. Insecticide resistance mapping in the vector of lymphatic filariasis, Culex

quinquefasciatus Say from northern region of West Bengal, India. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0217706.

[PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Bharati M, Saha D. Multiple insecticide resistance mechanisms in primary dengue vector, Aedes aegypti

(Linn.) from dengue endemic districts of sub-Himalayan West Bengal, India. PLoS One. 2018;13(9):e0203207.

[PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Wirth MC, Walton WE, Federici BA. Evolution of resistance in Culex quinquefasciatus (Say) selected

with a recombinant Bacillus thuringiensis strainproducing Cyt1Aa and Cry11Ba, and the binary toxin,

Bin, from Lysinibacillus sphaericus. J Med Entomol. 2015;52(5):1028-35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Melo AL, Soccol VT, Soccol CR. Bacillus thuringiensis: mechanism of action, resistance, and new applications: a review. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2016;36(2):317-26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Bonin A, Paris M, Frérot H, Bianco E, Tetreau G, Després L. The genetic architecture of a complex trait: resistance to multiple toxins produced by Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis in the dengue and yellow fever vector,

the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Infect Genet Evol. 2015 Oct;35:204-13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Bagavan A, Rahuman AA. Evaluation of larvicidal activity of medicinal plant extracts against three mosquito

vectors. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2011;4(1):29-34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Benelli G. Research in mosquito control: current challenges for a brighter future. Parasitol Res.

;114(8):2801-5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Price DN, Berry MS. Comparison of effects of octopamine and insecticidal essential oils on activity in the nerve cord, foregut, and dorsal unpaired median neurons of cockroaches. J Insect Physiol. 2006;52(3):309-19.

[PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Isman MB. Botanical insecticides: a global perspective. In: Gross AD, Coats JR, Duke SO, Seiber JN, editors.

Biopesticides: state of the art and future opportunities. American Chemical Society Publications; 2014. p. 21-

[Google Scholar]

Shaalan EA, Canyon DV. Mosquito oviposition deterrents. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018;25(11):10207-17.

[PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Pavela R, Benelli G. Ethnobotanical knowledge on botanical repellents employed in the African region

against mosquito vectors–a review. Exp Parasitol. 2016;167:103-8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Pavela R, Maggi F, Iannarelli R, Benelli G. Plant extracts for developing mosquito larvicides: from laboratory to

the field, with insights on the modes of action. Acta Trop. 2019;193:236-71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Spinozzi E, Maggi F, Bonacucina G, Pavela R, Boukouvala MC, Kavallieratos NG, Canale A, Romano D, Desneux N, Wilke AB, Beier JC, Benelli G. Apiaceae essential oils and their constituents as insecticides against mosquitoes—a review. Ind Crops Prod. 2021;171:113892. [Google Scholar]

Zhang QW, Lin LG, Ye WC. Techniques for extraction and isolation of natural products: a comprehensive

review. Chin Med. 2018;13:20. [PubMed] [GoogleScholar]

Tyagi BK, Munirathinam A, Venkatesh A. A catalogue of Indian mosquitoes. Int J Mosq Res. 2015;2(2):50-97.

[Google Scholar]

World Health Organisation. Guidelines for laboratory and field testing of mosquito larvicides. WHO; 2005.

[Google Scholar]

Jitoe A, Masuda T, Nakatani N. Phenylbutenoid dimers from the rhizomes of Zingiber cassumunar.

Phytochemistry. 1993;32(2):357-63. [Google Scholar]

Lim TK, editor. Zingiber montanum. In: Edible medicinal and non-medicinal plants. Vol. 12. Springer, Cham;

[Google Scholar]

Joram A, Das AK, Mahanta D. Evaluation of antioxidant and phenolic contents of Zingiber montanum (J.Koenig) Link ex Dietr.: a potential ethomedicinal plant of Arunachal Pradesh, India. Pleione. 2018;12(2):255-

[Google Scholar]

Kato E, Kubo M, Okamoto Y, Matsunaga Y, Kyo H, Suzuki N, Uebaba K, Fukuyama Y. Safety assessment

of Bangle (Zingiber purpureum Rosc.) rhizome extract: acute and chronic studies in rats and clinical studies in

human. ACS Omega. 2018;3(11):15879-89. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Majaw S, Moirangthem J. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of Clerodendron colebrookianum Walp. leaves

and Zingiber cassumunar Roxb. rhizomes. Ethnobot Leafl. 2009;13:578-89. [Google Scholar]

Kabkrathok P, Jarussophon S, Unger O, Lomarat P, Reutrakul V, Pittayanurak P, Bongcheewin B,

Anantachoke N. Mass spectral analysis of secondary metabolites from Zingiber montanum rhizome extract

Published
2024-03-04