Introducing Portfolios for Family Adoption Program for Undergraduates

  • Tanvir Kaur Sidhu Professor & Head, Community Medicine, Adesh Insti tute of Medical Sciences & Research, Bathinda, India.
  • Shyam Mehra Associate Professor & Head, Community, Medicine, Adesh Insti tute of Medical Sciences & Research, Bathinda, India.
  • Gurkirat Singh ssistant Professor & Head, CommunityMedicine, Adesh Insti tute of Medical Sciences & Research, Bathinda, India.
  • Harshpreet Singh Assistant Professor & Head, Community Medicine, Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Bathinda, India.
  • Jagriti Assistant Professor & Head, Community Medicine, Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Bathinda, India.
Keywords: Portf olio, Family Study, Family Adopti on Program, Learning and Assessment, Undergraduates

Abstract

Introduction: The “family study” has been a part of the undergraduate curriculum since the incepti on of the subject of Community Medicine. With the introducti on of the recommended Family Adopti on Program
as a part of the curriculum of Community Medicine, family study has gained a new and more robust face for community learning. To address the uti lity and impact of such a robust program involving experienti al learning, existi ng methods of learning and assessment need to be changed. Hence, the portf olio used for learning as well as assessment has been explored for the family adopti on program (FAP) at the undergraduate (UG) level.
Study Design: Interventi onal educati onal project.

Objecti ves: 1. Preparati on of framework for Portf olio development for FAP 2. Uti lizing the portf olio for student learning 3. Developing rubrics for portf olio assessment 4. Uti lizing portf olios for assessment
using the rubrics.
Method: The study was conducted involving one batch of 150 students and all faculty of the Community Medicine department. It was carried out in 3 phases - Developing a framework and guidelines for portf olio
development, Introducing portf olios to learners and mentoring in preparati on & organizati on & Assessment of portf olios.
Results: The Portf olio guidelines were developed and uti lized during FAP by the students and the mentors for learning and feedback. Additi onally, the Rubric for Assessment was developed and uti lized for portf olio assessment. Conclusion: Portf olio use by UGs for FAP was found to be suitable for sustainability and replicability.

References

National Medical Commission [Internet]. Implementation of new competency based medical education for undergraduate course curriculum. National Medical Commission, Undergraduate Medical Education Board; cited 2022 Mar 31 [cited 2023 Oct 19]. Available from: https://nmc.org.in/MCIRest/open/getDocument?path=/Documents/Public/Portal/LatestNews/Implementation.pdf

Mallik S. Family Adoption Program, a way forward to community based medical education challenges ahead.

J Comp Health. 2022;10(1):1-3.

Vanikar AV, Kumar V. The family adoption programme: taking Indian medical undergraduate education to

villages. Indian J Prev Soc Med. 2021;52(3):177-83.

Diab P, Flack P. Benefits of community-based education to the community in South African health

science facilities. Afr J Prim Health Care Family Med. 2013;5(1):474. [Google Scholar]

Amalba A, van Mook WN, Mogre V, Scherpbier AJ. The perceived usefulness of community-based education

and service (COBES) regarding students’ rural workplace choices. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Bansal PK. Portfolios in learning and assessment. In: Singh T, Anshu, editors. Principles of assessment in

medical education. 1st ed. Jaypee Publications; 2012. p. 173-9.

David MF, Davis MH, Harden RM, Howie PW, Ker J, Pippard MJ. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 24:

portfolios as a method of student assessment. Med Teach. 2001;23(6):535-51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Kumar BS, Shastri D. Portfolio in competency based medical education: a review of the current technology

for future trends. Natl J Basic Med Sci. 2018;9(1):50-60.

Davis MH, Ponnamperuma GG. Portfolios, projects and dissertations. In: Dent JA, Harden RM, editors. A

practical guide for medical teachers. 3rd ed. London: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone. 2006. p. 349-56. [Google

Scholar]

Haldane T. “Portfolios” as a method of assessment in medical education. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench.

;7(2):89-93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Challis M. AMEE Medical Education Guide No.11 (revised): portfolio-based learning and assessment in

medical education. Med Teach. 1999;21(4):370-86. [Google Scholar]

Van Tartwijk J, Driessen EW. Portfolios for assessment and learning: AMEE Guide no. 45. Med Teach.

;31(9):790-801. [PubMed] [Google Scholar

Published
2024-06-30