A longitudinal study on safety and clinical efficacy of rabies biologicals for post exposure prophylaxis among the vulnerable elderly population at the anti-rabies clinic, Bangalore

  • Ravish S Haradanhalli Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Bangalore, India
  • G Gouri Vijay Department of Community Medicine, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Bangalore, India
  • Navyashree N S Department of Community Medicine, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Bangalore, India
  • Divya Bharathi G Department of Community Medicine, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Bangalore, India
Keywords: Safety, Clinical efficacy, Rabies biologicals, Post exposure prophylaxis, Elderly

Abstract

Introduction: Animal exposures are a public health problem that occurs largely in the underserved populations where there is close habitation of human and dog populations. The elderly are more vulnerable to animal bites, often unable to defend themselves, and require immediate post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), which is effective in preventing rabies. The present study was conducted to study the safety and clinical efficacy of post-exposure prophylaxis among this vulnerable group.

Methodology: All the elderly individuals who came for post-exposure prophylaxis to the anti-rabies clinic were included in the study after obtaining written informed consent. The details on socio-demographic profile and characteristics of animal bites and PEP provided were recorded. A safety assessment was done by recording the adverse drug reactions (ADRs), both local & systemic, immediately & subsequently up to day 28. Likewise, all the patients were followed up to 6 months after PEP to know their health status and for the clinical efficacy of PEP.

Results: The study included 54 subjects with category III exposure, aged between 60 and 97 years. All the subjects were provided post-exposure prophylaxis as recommended by NCDC, India. Among the study subjects, 12 (22.2%) reported ADRs such as pain (14.8%), itching (3.7%), erythema (1.9%), and malaise (1.9%), which were mild and resolved without any complications. All the study subjects were healthy and alive at the end of 6 months.

Conclusion: The post-exposure prophylaxis provided was safe and clinically effective in preventing rabies among the elderly in category III animal exposures and supports its continued usage in this vulnerable group.

DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.24321/0973.5038.202606

How to cite this article:
Ravish H S, Vijay G G, Navyashree N S, Bharathi D G. A Longitudinal Study on Safety and Clinical Efficacy of Rabies Biologicals for Post Exposure Prophylaxis Among the Vulnerable Elderly Population at the Anti-Rabies Clinic, Bangalore. APCRI J. 2026; 28(1): 10-14.

References

World Health Organization. WHO expert consultation on rabies: third report. World Health Organization; 2018 Aug 31. [Google Scholar]

Tarantola A. Four thousand years of concepts relating to rabies in animals and humans, its prevention and its cure. Tropical medicine and infectious disease. 2017 Mar 24;2(2):5.[Google Scholar]

World Health Organization. Strategic framework for elimination of human rabies transmitted by dogs in the South-East Asia region. [Google Scholar]

World Health Organization. Weekly epidemiological record. Rabies Vaccines: WHO position paper No. 16. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 2018;93:201-20. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-wer9316

Minghui R, Stone M, Semedo MH, Nel L. New global strategic plan to eliminate dog-mediated rabies by 2030. The Lancet global health. 2018 Aug 1;6(8):e828- 9.[Google Scholar]

National Guidelines for Rabies Prophylaxis. National rabies con trol programme. National Centre for Diseases Control. New Delhi (India): Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; 2019. p. 618.

https://ncdc.mohfw.gov.in/uploads/resource/1769332447_National-Guidelines-for-Rabies-Prophylaxis.pdf

Published
2026-07-10
Section
Research Article