Measuring Agency, Voice, and Gender Attitudes among Adolescents in South Asia

  • Amita N Vyas Associate Professor, Department of Prevention and Community Health, The George Washington University, Milken Institute School of Public Health, Washington, DC, America.
  • Nitasha C Nagaraj Assistant Professor, Department of Prevention and Community Health, The George Washington University, Milken Institute School of Public Health, Washington, DC, America.
  • Woyni Teklay Graduate Student Assistant, Department of Global Health, The George Washington University, Milken Institute School of Public Health, Washington, DC, America.
  • Richa Hingorani India Program Lead, Girl Rising, New Delhi, India.
  • Jaya Luintel President & Chief Executive Officer, The Story Kitchen, Kupondole, Lalitpur, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Megan Landry Adjunct Faculty, Department of Prevention and Community Health, The George Washington University, Milken Institute School of Public Health, Washington, DC, America.
Keywords: Voice, Agency, Gender Attittudes, Measurement, Adolescents, South Asia

Abstract

Introduction: Voice, agency, and gender attitudes are concepts that are inextricably linked to empowerment, health, and long-term economic well-being for girls, women, families, and communities. The present study is aimed at developing and validating scales for voice, agency, and gender attitudes for adolescents in South Asia.
Method: Qualitative and quantitative research was conducted to develop and validate scales for voice, agency, and gender attitudes among adolescent boys and girls in urban, semi-urban, and rural settings in South Asia. There were two rounds of data collection with the first including 460 adolescents and the second round approximately 2 weeks later with 484 adolescents.The formative qualitative phase also included four focus groups with 30 girls and 25 boys between the ages of 10 and 16 years in Delhi and Lucknow, India.
Results: Thematic analysis led to the development of survey scale items in both English and Hindi and face validity testing was conducted with 10 adolescents aged 10-14 years in India. The data for validation of the scales were derived from self-reported surveys from adolescents 10-15 years old in public schools located in Delhi, India (urban), Uttar Pradesh, India (rural), and Gandaki Province, Nepal, (semi-urban). Six factors emerged from the analysis, and all six factors maintained dimensions of empowerment and are closely intertwined to voice, agency, and gender attitudes.
Conclusions: The measures that emerged from the analysis provide the foundation to expand upon different dimensions of voice, agency, and gender attitudes that are salient to adolescent boys and girls in South Asia.

How to cite this article:
Vyas AN, Nagaraj NC, Teklay W, Hingorani R, Luintel J, Landry M. Measuring Agency, Voice, and Gender Attitudes among Adolescents in South Asia. Ind J Youth Adol Health. 2021;8(4):8-21.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24321/2349.2880.202113

References

United Nations Children’s Fund. The state of the world’s children 2011. Adolescence: an age of opportunity. New York: UNICEF; 2011. [Google Scholar]

World Health Organization. Adolescent health research priorities: report of a Technical Consultation 13th and 14th October 2015, Geneva, Switzerland. World Health Organization; 2015.

United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF) [Internet]. UNICEF programme guidance for the second decade: programming with and for adolescents; 2018 [cited 2021 Aug 29]. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/media/57336/file

United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF) [Internet]. Global initiative on out-ofschool children: South Asia regional study, covering,Bangladesh, India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka; 2014 [cited 2021 Aug 29]. Available from: https://reliefweb.int/report/bangladesh/global-initiative-out-schoolchildren-south-asia-regional-study-covering

Jewkes R, Morrell R. Hegemonic masculinity, violence, and gender equality: using latent class analysis to investigate the origins and correlates of differences between men. Men Mascul. 2018;21(4):547-71. [Google Scholar]

Yu C, Zuo X, Blum RW, Tolman DL, KÃ¥gesten A, Mmari K, Meyer SD, Michielsen K, Basu S, Acharya R, Lian Q, Lou C. Marching to a different drummer: a cross-cultural comparison of young adolescents who challenge gender norms. J Adolesc Health. 2017;61(4):S48-S54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Peitzmeier SM, KÃ¥gesten A, Acharya R, Cheng Y, Delany-Moretlwe S, Olumide A, Blum RW, Sonenstein F, Drecker MR. Intimate partner violence perpetration among adolescent males in disadvantaged neighborhoods globally. J Adolesc Health. 2016;59(6):696-702. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Connell RW, Messerschmidt JW. Hegemonic masculinity: rethinking the concept. Gender Soc. 2005;19(6):829-59. [Google Scholar]

Klugman J, Hanmer L, Twigg S, Hasan T, McCleary-Sills J, Santamaria J. Voice and agency: empowering women and girls for shared prosperity. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2014. [Google Scholar]

Zimmerman LA, Li M, Moreau, C, Wilopo S, Blum R. Measuring agency as a dimension of empowerment among young adolescents globally; findings from the Global Early Adolescent Study. SSM Popul Health. 2019;8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Gammage S, Kabeer N, Rodgers YM. Voice and agency: where are we now? Femin Econ. 2016;22(1):1-29. [Google Scholar]

Landry M, Vyas AN, Malhotra G, Nagaraj N. Adolescents’ development of gender equity attitudes in India. Int J Adolesc Youth. 2020;19(1):99-103. [Google Scholar]

Hill JP, Lynch ME. The intensification of gender-related role expectations during early adolescence. In: Brooks-Gunn J, Peterson AC, editors. Girls at puberty. NY: Springer US; 1983. p. 201-8. [Google Scholar]

Vyas AN, Malhotra G, Nagaraj NC, Landry M. Gender attitudes in adolescence: evaluating the girl rising gender-sensitization program in India. Int J Adolesc Youth. 2020;25(1):126-39. [Google Scholar]

KÃ¥gesten A, Gibbs S, Blum RW, Moreau C, Chandra Mouli V, Herbert A, Amin A. Understanding factors that shape gender attitudes in early adolescence globally: a mixed-methods systematic review. PloS One. 2016;11(6):e0157805. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Tolman DL, Davis BR, Bowman CP. “That’s just how it isâ€: a gendered analysis of masculinity and femininity ideologies in adolescent girls’ and boys’ heterosexual relationships. J Adolesc Res. 2016;31:3-31. [Google Scholar]

Thekkudan J, Menon R, Thomas M. Understanding social norms underpinning domestic violence in India.Technical background paper for Oxfam India’s Campaign on elimination of violence against women and girls. Oxfam; 2016.

Gurang YB, Suwal BR, Pradhan MS, Tamang MS. Getting REDD right for women: an analysis of the barriers and opportunities for women’s participation in the REDD+ sector in Asia. USAID [United States Agency for International Development]. USAID; Sep 2011.

International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015-16: India. Vol I. International Institute of Population Science, ICF; 2017. p. 1-192.

Patkar A. Socio-economic status and female literacy in India. Int J Edu Dev. 1995;15(4):401-9. [Google Scholar]

Acharya M, Bennett L. The status of women in Nepal: a critical review. Kathmandu: Center for Economic Development and Administration; 1981.

Pennels L. Girl’s and women’s education policies and implementation mechanism, case study: Nepal. Bangkok: UNESCO principal regional office for Asia and the Pacific; 1998.

Panthhe KP. Gender difference in rural urban education in Nepal. Eur J Edu Sci. 2015;2(2):61-79. [Google Scholar]

The World Bank [Internet]. Proportion of seats held by women in national parliaments (%); 1998 [cited 2021 Sep 2]. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SG.GEN.PARL.ZS

Achyut P, Bhatla N, Verma H, Uttamacharya, Singh G, Bhattacharya S, Verma R. Towards gender equality: the GEMS journey thus far. New Delhi: International Center for Research on Women; 2016.

Nanda G. Compendium of gender scales. Washington, DC: FHI, 360; 2011.

Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 2nd ed. United Kingdom: Guilford Publications; 2005.

Joreskog K, Sorbom D. Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. NY: University Press of America; 1993.

Rotter JB. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychol Monogr. 1996;80(1):1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Stanley LM, Edwards MC. Reliability and model fit. Educ Psychol Meas. 2016;76(6):976-85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Published
2021-12-29