Immediate and Acute Effect of Self Myofascial Release vs Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization on Flexibility, Strength and Sport-Specific Performance in Young Male Soccer Players

  • Mondal Entaj SK Mondal Entaj SK, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Jamia Hamdard, Delhi, India.
  • Kalpana Zutshi Associate Professor, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Jamia Hamdard, Delhi, India.
  • Meenu Dhingra Senior Scientific Officer, Sports Authority of India, New Delhi, India.
Keywords: Soccer, Self-Myofascial Release, Instrument Assisted Soft-Tissue Mobilization, Physical Performance, Vertec

Abstract

Background: Regular exercise and performance can result in microtrauma, which is minor damage to the mus cle. The resulting inflammatory response may lead to fascia scar tissue over time, which in turn may lead to muscular dysfunction.
Purpose: The purpose of our study was to compare the immediate and acute effects of SMR and IASTM on flexibility, strength and sport-specific performance in young male soccer players.
Method: Twenty-seven young male soccer players were randomly assigned to receive either SMR via plain foam roller or IASTM via M2T blade. To compare the effect of interventions, subjects were assessed on measures of flexibility via sit and reach test, power through vertical jump test, agility by Illinois agility test, 20m sprint test and strength test by a dynamometer.
Results: A one-way ANOVA was used to analyze differences. To test for the difference between interventions and across 3 assessments, a 3X3 split-plot ANOVA with a group (control, SMR, IASTM), time (0 min, 10 mins, 20 mins) and interaction effect (Group X Time) was employed. There was a significant difference in strength during the performance without intervention vs. immediately after SMR and IASTM (p=0.03).
Conclusion: The findings of the study suggest that SMR and IASTM did not improve physical performance in young male soccer players, but they did not hinder performance either. Even if performance does not improve, there does not seem to be any adverse effect of using either SMR or IASTM before physical activity, athletes need not be discouraged from using these tools.

How to cite this article:
Mondal Entaj SK, Zutshi K, Dhingra M. Immediate and Acute Effect of Self Myofascial Release vs Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization on Flexibility, Strength and Sport-Specific Performance in Young Male Soccer Players. Ind J Youth Adol Health. 2022;9(2):14-20

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24321/2349.2880.202209

References

Cantu, ri and grodin, aj. Myofascial manipulation theory and clinical application. Gaithersburg, md: Aspen publishers, inc, 2001.

Barnes, mf. The basic science of myofascial release: Morphologic change in connective tissue. J bodyw mov ther 1: 231–238, 1997.

Cafarelli, e and flint, f. The role of massage in preparation for and recovery from exercise. Sports med 14: 1–9, 1992.

Goodwin, je, glaister, m, howatson, g, lockey, ra, and mcinnes, g. Effect of preperformance lower-limb massage on thirty-meter sprint running. J strength cond res 21: 1028–1031, 2007.

Reilly, t, bangsbo, j, and franks, a. Anthropometric and physiological predispositions for elite soccer. J sports sci 18: 669– 683, 2000.

Meylan, c, and, malatesta; d. Effects of in-season plyometric training within 20 soccer practice on explosive actions of young players. J strength cond res 23: 2605- 2613, 2009.

Stolen, t, chamari, k, castagna, c, and wisloff, u. Physiology of soccer. An update. Sports med 35: 501–536, 2005.

Hoff, j, and helgerud, j. Endurance and strength training for soccer player:Physiological considerations. Sports med 34: 165-180, 2004.

Macdonald, gz, button, dc, drinkwater, ej, and behm, dg. Foam rolling as a recovery tool after an intense bout of physical activity. Med sci sports exerc 46: 131–142, 2014.

Cheatham, sw, kolber,mj, cain, m, and lee, m. The effects of selfmyofascial release using a foam roll or roller massager on joint range of motion, muscle recovery and performance: A systematic review. Int j sports phys ther 10: 827–838, 2015.

Georgiou m. The influence of component materials on grastontechnique effectiveness during the treatment of myofascial painsyndrome [thesis]. Durban, south africa: Durban institute oftechnology; 2006.

Markovic, g. Acute effects of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization vs. Foam rolling on knee and hip range of motion in soccer players. J bodyw mov ther 19: 690–696, 2015.

Schaefer jl, sandrey ma. Effects of a 4-week dynamic-balance-trainingprogram supplemented with graston instrument-assisted soft-tissuemobilization for chronic ankle instability. J sport rehabil; 21:313–326, 2012.

Sullivan, km, silvey, dbj, button, dc, and behm, dg. Rollermassager application to the hamstrings increases sit-and-reach range of motion within five to ten seconds without performance impairments. Int j sports phys ther 8: 228–236, 2013.

Janot, j, malin, b, cook, r, hagenbucher, j draeger, a, jordan, m, et al. Effects of self-myofascial release and static stretching on anaerobic power output. J fit res 2:41–54, 2013.

Macdonald, gz, penney,md, mullaley,me, cuconato, al, drake, cd, behm, dg, et al. An acute bout of self-myofascial release increases range of motion without a subsequent decrease in muscle activation or force. J strength cond res 27: 812–821, 2013.

Cheatham sw, lee m, cain m, bakerr. Theefficacyof instrumentassisted soft tissuemobilization: A systematic reviewj can chiropr assoc. Sep;60(3):200-211,2016.

Debra a. Stroiney, rebecca l. Mokris, gary r. Hanna, and john d. Ranney; examination of self-myofascial release vs. Instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilization techniques on vertical and horizontal power in recreational athletes. Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2018.

Skarabot, J, Beardsley, C, and Stirn, I. Comparing the effects of self-myofascial release with static stretching on ankle range-ofmotion in adolescent athletes. Int J Sports Phys Ther 10: 203–212, 2015.

Macdonald, n, baker, r, and cheatham, sw. The effects of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization on lower extremity muscle performance: A randomized controlled trial. Int j sports phys ther 11: 1040–1047, 2016.

Mikesky, ae, bahamonde, re, stanton, k, alvey, t, and fitton, t. Acute effects of the stick-on strength, power, and flexibility. J strength cond res 16: 446–450, 2002.

Pincivero DM, Gandhi V, Timmons MK, Coelho AJ. Quadriceps femoris electromyogram during concentric, isometric and eccentric phases of fatiguing dynamic knee extensions. Journal of Biomechanics. 2006; 39246-254.

McLean SG, Borotikar B, Lucey SM. Lower limb muscle pre-motor time measures during a choice reaction task

associate with knee abduction loads during dynamic single-leg landings. Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon). 20 10; 25:563-569.

Healey KC, Hatfield DL, Blanpied P, Dorfman IR, and Riebe D. The effects of myofascial release with foam

rolling on performance. J strength cond res. 2014;28: 61-68.

Published
2022-06-30