A Study on the Incidence of Surgical site Infections and related Pathogens in Obstetrics & Gynaecology in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Andaman & Nicobar Islands

  • Abhishek Malakar Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ANIIMS, Port Blair, India.
  • Parthasarathy Gopalan Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, ANIIMS, Port Blair, India. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6163-8495
  • Shreya Barik Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ANIIMS, Port Blair, India.
  • Abhishek Ray Senior Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ANIIMS, Port Blair, India.
Keywords: Surgical Site Infection, Caesarean Section, Hysterectomy, MRSA, Pseudomonas, Andaman & Nicobar

Abstract

Background: Surgical site infection is one of the most common complications after any operative procedure.

Aim: To determine the incidence of postoperative surgical site infection in Obstetrics and Gynaecology and also to identify the common causative organisms and their susceptibility to antimicrobials.

Material & Methods: We have analysed data from all the postoperative patients suffering from Surgical Site Infection (SSI), from December 2018 to November 2019 in Andaman and Nicobar Islands Institute of Medical Sciences (ANIIMS).

Result: Overall incidence of SSI was 9.17%. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common organism identified (38%), with a high incidence of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) (42.86%), followed by Pseudomonas (23.91%). Overall gram-negative bacteria were responsible for more than half of the cases. All the staphylococcal isolates including MRSA were susceptible to linezolid and regarding antibiotic susceptibility of gram-negative organisms, imipenem and piperacillin-tazobactam were most effective.

Conclusion: There is emergence of drug-resistant strains of different bacteria such as Pseudomonas and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. Injudicious use of antibiotics is one of the reasons for this and, hence, there is need for a proper antibiotic protocol that should be formulated based on local trends and susceptibility of microorganisms.

How to cite this article:
Malakar A, Gopalan P, Barik S, Ray A. A Study on the Incidence of Surgical site Infections and related Pathogens in Obstetrics & Gynaecology in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Andaman & Nicobar Islands. Epidem Int 2019; 4(4): 20-24.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24321/2455.7048.201920

References

Bagnall NM, Vig S, Trivedi P. Surgical-site infection. Surgery 2009; 27(10): 426-430. Available from:

https://www.surgeryjournal.co.uk/article/S0263-9319(09)00174-4/abstract [PubMed/ Google Scholar]

Mawalla B, Mshana SE, Chalya PL, Imirzalioglu C, Mahalu W. Predictors of surgical site infections among

patients undergoing major surgery at Bugando Medical Centre in Northwestern Tanzania. BMC Surgery 2011;

: 21. Available from: https://bmcsurg.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2482-11-21 [PubMed/

Google Scholar/ ResearchGate].

Koneman EW, Allen SD, Jande WM, Schreckenberger PC, Winn WC Jr. Koneman’s Colour Atlas and Textbookof

Diagnostic Microbiology. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams; 2006.

Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 27th

ed, 2017. CLSI supplement M100, Wayne PA, USA.

Harish Babu BG, Narmadha NS, Soujanya L, Rathika R, Haja Abdul Nazeer MJ. Surgical Wound Infections

in Obstetrics and Gynaecology - A Study from Rural Tertiary Care Hospital. International Journal of

Innovative Research in Medical Science. December 2017; 2(12): 1569-1572. Available from: https://ijirms.

in/index.php/ijirms/article/view/209 [Google Scholar].

Dessie W, Mulugeta G, Fentaw S, Mihret A, Hassen M, Abebe E. Pattern of Bacterial Pathogens and

their Susceptibility Isolated from Surgical Site Infections at Selected Referral Hospitals, Addis

Ababa, Ethiopia. Int J Microbiol 2016; 2016: 2418902.Available from: http://downloads.hindawi.com/

journals/ijmicro/2016/2418902.pdf [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2418902/ PubMed/ Google

Scholar].

Kaur K, Oberoi L, Devi P. Bacteriological profile of surgical site infections. IAIM 2017; 4(12): 77-83.

Available from: https://iaimjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/iaim_2017_0412_14.pdf [Google

Scholar].

Bhadauria AR, Hariharan C. Clinical study of postoperative wound infections in obstetrics and

gynaecological surgeries in a tertiary care set up. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2013; 2: 631-638.

Available from: https://www.ijrcog.org/index.php/ijrcog/article/view/259 [Google Scholar].

Yalçin AN, Bakir M, Bakici Z, Dökmetas I, Sabir N. Postoperative wound infections. J Hosp Infect 1995; 29(4):

-309. Available from: https://www.journalofhospitalinfection.com/article/0195-6701(95)90278-3/pdf

[PubMed].

Starling CE, Couto BR, Pinheiro SMC. Applying the centers for disease control and prevention and national

nosocomial surveillance system methods in Brazilian hospitals. Am J Infect Control 1997; 25(4): 303-311.

Available from: https://www.ajicjournal.org/article/S0196-6553(97)90022-5/pdf [PubMed/ Google

Scholar].

Eltahawy AT, Mokhtar AA, Khalaf RM, Bahnassy AA. Postoperative wound infection at a university hospital

in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. J Hosp Infect 1992; 21: 79-83. [PubMed/ Google Scholar].

Negi V, Pal S, Juyal D, Sharma MK, Sharma N. Bacteriological Profile of Surgical Site Infections and

Their Antibiogram: A Study From Resource Constrained Rural Setting of Uttarakhand State, India. J Clin Diagn Res

; 9(10): DC17-DC20. [PubMed/ Goolge Scholar].

Aggarwal A, Khanna S, Arora U, Devi P. Correlation of beta-lactamase production/methicillin resistance and

phage pattern of Staphylococcus aureus. Indian J Med Sci 2001; 55(5): 253-256. [PubMed/ Google Scholar].

Kownhar H, Shankar EM, Vignesh R, Sekar R, Velu V, Rao UA. High isolation rate of Staphylococcus aureus

from surgical site infections in an Indian hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother 2008; 61: 758-760. [PubMed/

Google Scholar].

Eagye KJ, Kim A, Laohavaleeson S, Kuti JL, Nicolau DP. Surgical site infections: does inadequate antibiotic

therapy affect patient outcomes? SurgInfect (Larchmt) 2009; 10(4): 323-331. [PubMed/ Google Scholar].

Masaadeh HA, Jaran AS. Incident of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in post-operative wound infection. Am

J Infect Dis 2009; 5: 1-6. Available from: https://thescipub.com/pdf/10.3844/ajidsp.2009.1.6 [Google

Scholar].

Sohn AH, Parvez FM, Vu T, Hai HH, Bich NN, Le Thu TA. Prevalence of surgical-site infections and patterns of

antimicrobial use in a large tertiary-care hospital in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

; 23(7): 382-387. [PubMed/ Google Scholar].

Mundhada AS, Tenpe S. A study of organisms causing surgical site infections and their antimicrobial

susceptibility in atertiary care Government Hospital. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2015; 58(2): 195-200.

Available from: http://www.ijpmonline.org/article.asp?issn=0377-4929;year=2015;volume=58;issue=2

;spage=195;epage=200;aulast=Mundhada [Google Scholar].

Published
2020-02-07