Accuracy of the Novel ENTraview Mobile Device to Increase Access to Screening and Provisional Diagnosis of Ear Disease in Underserved Communities Across India
Abstract
Background: The WHO estimates that there are more than 360 million people (5% of the total population) currently living with disabling hearing loss. There is an enormous and often invisible, global burden of hearing loss and ear disease, especially in low and middle-income countries, where environmental factors are significant and access to preventative and treatment health services is challenging.
Methods: A retrospective sampling study was completed to compare the agreement in screening for and diagnosing ear disease/hearing issues between the CHWs using ENTraview and the ENT specialist diagnosis.
Results: Shruti ENTraview device otology functionality accuracy was examined over a total of 573 patients (34 ± 19 years old, 43% female). The most common diagnoses were CSOM in 50% of patients, wax in 35% and ASOM in 6%. The sensitivity rate of the community health worker diagnosis was 96.9% with a corresponding 95% confidence interval of 95.1-98.1%.
Conclusion: The burden of ear disease and hearing loss, within communities across India is high and barriers exist, for patients and providers, across the continuum of care, including access to early screening and diagnosis.
How to cite this article:
Deshmukh BG, Bhisegaonkar DA, Phatak P, Sachdeva S, Kueffer F, Sahai G, Bhatnagar K. Accuracy of the Novel ENTraview Mobile Device to Increase Access to Screening and Provisional Diagnosis of Ear Disease in Underserved Communities Across India Epidem. Int. 2022;7(1):21-24.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24321/2455.7048.202207
References
WHO. Global costs of unaddressed hearing loss and cost-effectiveness of intervention. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2017.
Graydon K, Waterworth C, Miller H, Gunasekera H. Global burden of hearing impairment and ear disease. J Laryngol Otol. 2019 Jan;133(1):18-25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Swanepoel de W, Myburgh HC, Howe DM, Mahomed F, Eikelboom RH. Smartphone hearing screening with
integrated quality control and data management. International Journal of Audiology 2014 Dec;53(12):841-9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Bexelius C, Honeth L, Ekman A, Eriksson M, Sandin S, Bagger-Sjöbäck D, Litton JE. Evaluation of an internet-
based hearing test-comparison with established methods for detection of hearing loss. J Med Internet Res. 2008 Oct;10(4):e32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Nast DR, Speer WS, Le Prell CG. Sound level measurements using smartphone “appsâ€: useful or inaccurate?Noise Health 2014 Sep-Oct;16(72):251-6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Nast DR, Speer WS, Le Prell CG. Sound level measurements using smartphone “appsâ€: useful or
inaccurate? Noise Health 2014 Sep-Oct;16(72):251-6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Peer S, Fagan JJ. Hearing loss in the developing world: evaluating the iPhone mobile device as a screening tool. S Afr Med J. 2015 Jan;105(1):35-9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Copyright (c) 2022 Bharat Ganesh Deshmukh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.