Effectiveness of Mulligan’s Bent Leg Raise (BLR) and Gate Technique among Patients with Non-Specific Low Back Pain – A Randomised Controlled Trial

  • Abinaya S Assistant Professor, School of Physiotherapy, Aarupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital, Vinayaka Mission’s Research Foundation (DU), India.
  • Dhivyadharshini V Assistant Professor, School of Physiotherapy, Aarupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital, Vinayaka Mission’s Research Foundation (DU), India.
  • Muralisankar KSI Director, School of Physiotherapy, Aarupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital, Vinayaka Mission’s Research Foundation (DU), India.
  • Thilagavathi S Undergraduate Student, School of Physiotherapy, Aarupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital, Vinayaka Mission’s Research Foundation (DU), India.
Keywords: Bent Leg Raise Technique, Gate Technique, Non-Specific Low Back Pain, Visual Analogue Scale, Modified-Modified Schober Test

Abstract

Introduction: Despite a great deal of research, the reasons for low back pain remain unknown, and the results of treatment are not adequate. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether Mulligan’s Bent Leg Raise and Gate approach was beneficial for non-specific low back pain. This study is intriguing in that the technique utilised in previous studies was primarily focused on improving the hamstring flexibility of patients with lower back pain; in contrast, the focus here was on improving the patient’s pain and range of motion.
Method: Eighty samples in total were collected and split into two groups: A = 40 and B = 40. For four weeks, Group A received Mulligan’s Bent Leg Raise technique, while Group B received the Gate technique with the participants ranging in age from 20 to 59 years. Five days a week for four weeks, the pre- and post-test results for the modified - modified Schober Test and Visual Analogue Scale were recorded.
Results: Following therapy, both variables (pain and ROM) significantly (i.e., p < 0.05) improved in both group outcome parameters, according to a group analysis using a paired t test.
Conclusion: Although post-treatment between group studies using an unpaired t test revealed that there was no statistically significant distinction between the groups that were administered the Gate or Bent Leg Raise approach, it concluded that both techniques are equally effective.

How to cite this article:
Abinaya S, Dhivyadharshini V, Muralisankar K S I, Thilagavathi S. Effectiveness of Mulligan’s Bent Leg Raise (BLR) and Gate Technique among Patients with Non-Specific Low Back Pain – A Randomised Controlled Trial. Chettinad Health City Med J. 2024;13(4):63-68.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24321/2278.2044.202460

References

Anand AR. Effectiveness of gate technique in improving functional activities in subjects with acute non specific low back pain [dissertation]. Chennai: Madha College of Physiotherapy; 2016.

Bogduk N. Clinical anatomy of the lumbar spine and sacrum. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2005. [Google Scholar]

Levangie PK, Norkin CC. Joint structure and function: a comprehensive analysis. FA Davis Company; 2011 Mar 9. [Google Scholar]

Balagué F, Mannion AF, Pellisé F, Cedraschi C. Nonspecific low back pain. Lancet. 2012 Feb 4;379(9814):482-91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Aggarwal N, Anand T, Kishore J, Ingle GK. Low back pain and associated risk factors among undergraduate students of a medical college in Delhi. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2013;26(2):103-8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Pawar AH, Metgud S. Comparative effectiveness of Mulligan’s traction straight leg raise and bent leg raise in low back ache with radiculopathy—a randomized clinical trial [dissertation]. Belgaum, Karnataka: KLE University; 2016.

Wáng YX, Wáng JQ, Káplár Z. Increased low back pain prevalence in females than in males after menopause age: evidences based on synthetic literature review. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2016 Apr;6(2):199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Iizuka Y, Iizuka H, Mieda T, Tsunoda D, Sasaki T, Tajika T, Yamamoto A, Takagishi K. Prevalence of chronic nonspecific low back pain and its associated factors among middle-aged and elderly people: an analysis based on data from a musculoskeletal examination in Japan. Asian Spine J. 2017 Dec;11(6):989. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Malik K, Sahay P, Saha S, Das RK. Normative values of modified-modified Schober test in measuring lumbar flexion and extension: a cross-sectional study. Int J Health Sci Res. 2016;6(7):177-87. [Google Scholar]

Chiwaridzo M, Naidoo N. Prevalence and associated characteristics of recurrent non-specific low back pain in Zimbabwean adolescents: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Dec;15:381. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Kotwal PP, Mittal K. Joshi and Kotwal’s essentials of orthopedics and applied physiotherapy-e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2020 Jun 18. [Google Scholar]

Cohen SP, Argoff CE, Carragee EJ. Management of low back pain. BMJ. 2008 Dec 22;337:a2718. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Phansopkar PA, Kage V. Efficacy of Mulligan’s two leg rotation and bent leg raise techniques in hamstring flexibility in subjects with acute non-specific low back pain: randomized clinical trial. Int J Physiother Res. 2014;2(5):733-41.

Hall T, Hardt S, Schäfer A, Wallin L. Mulligan bent leg raise technique—a preliminary randomized trial of immediate effects after a single intervention. Man Ther. 2006 May;11(2):130-5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Hall T, Beyerlein C, Hansson U, Lim HT, Odermark M, Sainsbury D. Mulligan traction straight leg raise: a pilot study to investigate effects on range of motion in patients with low back pain. J Man Manip Ther. 2006;14(2):95-100. [Google Scholar]

Page P. Current concepts in muscle stretching for exercise and rehabilitation. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Feb;7(1):109. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Hoffman SL, Johnson MB, Zou D, Dillen LR. Differences in end-range lumbar flexion during slumped sitting and forward bending between low back pain subgroups and genders. Man Ther. 2012 Apr;17(2):157-63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Addison R, Schultz A. Trunk strengths in patients seeking hospitalization for chronic low-back disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1980;5(6):539-44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Published
2024-12-31