Training Medical Teachers for Designing Curriculum for Open Distance Learning Programmes Using Flipped Classroom

Ruchika Kuba; Biplab Jamatia; T K Jena

Ruchika Kuba Director, School of Health Sciences, Indira Gandhi National Open University, New Delhi, India.
Biplab Jamatia Associate Professor, School of Health Sciences, Indira Gandhi National Open University, New Delhi, India.
T K Jena Professor, School of Health Sciences, Indira Gandhi National Open University, New Delhi, India.

Keywords: Flipped Classroom, Open and Distance Learning, Medical Education, IGNOU

Abstract

Introduction: Medical teachers play a pivotal role in bringing forth competent and qualified medical professionals. Although they follow their style of teaching, they need to be updated with the latest developments and approaches to explore alternative and more effective modes of instruction.
Method: In this study, a flipped classroom approach adopted for training the medical fraternity for curriculum planning and the use of online tools for teaching learning was analysed for its effectiveness and satisfaction among the participants.
Results: It was found that 40% were able to correctly frame objectives, 67% had their videos uploaded on YouTube, and 80% had online assessment tools. 83% were confident in sharing Google Docs, 75% in organising Google Meet, 67% undertake website development and 54% confident in curriculum development for an Open Distance Learning programme.
Conclusion: The participants were highly satisfied with the online sessions, enjoyed working with their peers, and responded that skills like video and assessment preparation would be very useful in their day-to-day teaching.

References

Siemens G, Matheos K. Systemic changes in higher education. In Educ [Internet]. 2012 Dec 10 [cited 2023 Jul 10];16(1):3-18. Available from: https://journals. uregina.ca/ineducation/article/view/42 [Google Scholar]

Palloff RM, Pratt K. Lessons from the virtual classroom: the realities of online teaching. Oxford: John Wiley &

Sons; 2013. [Google Scholar]

Alman S, Tomer C, Lincoln ML. Designing online learning: a primer for librarians. a primer for librarians. ABC-CLIO; 2012. [Google Scholar]

Zodpey S, Sharma A, Zahiruddin QS, Gaidhane A, Shrikhande S. Faculty development programs for medical teachers in India. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2016;4(2):97-101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Saiyad S, Virk A, Mahajan R, Singh T. Online teaching in medical training: establishing good online teaching

practices from cumulative experience. Int J App Basic Med Res. 2020;10(3):149. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Goh PS, Sandars J. A vision of the use of technology in medical education after the COVID-19 pandemic. MedEdPublish (2016). 2020;9:49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Ozyeshil Z. Five factor personality traits as predictor of trait anger and anger expression. Educ Sci.

;37(163):322-31. [Google Scholar]

Abdulahad FH, Saleh AM, Shabila NP. Introduction and initial evaluation of a newly designed teaching course

for medical faculty members in Erbil, Iraq. Middle East J Family Med. 2012;10(4):38-44. [Google Scholar]

Jamal S, Rana MH, Safdar CA, Khan A, Shukr I. Short duration medical education workshops-analysis of participants’ response. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2012;62(1):115-8. [Google Scholar]

McLean S, Attardi SM, Faden L, Goldszmidt M. Flipped classrooms and student learning: not just surface gains. Adv Physiol Educ. 2016 Mar;40(1):47-55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Zainuddin Z, Attaran M. Malaysian students’ perceptions of flipped classroom: a case study. Innov Educ Teach Int. 2016;53(6):660-70. [Google Scholar]

Rowe M, Frantz J, Bozalek V. Beyond knowledge and skills: the use of a Delphi study to develop a technology-mediated teaching strategy. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13(1):51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]