A Comparative Study of Perception of Online Teaching Versus Traditional Teaching among MBBS Students during COVID Crisis

Comparison of Online Teaching Versus Traditional Teaching in MBBS

  • Praveena Daya A Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Thirunelveli Medical College, Thirunelveli, Tamilnadu, India.
  • Prema Priya G Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vinayaka Missions Kirupanandavariyar Medical College and Hospital, VMRF (DU), Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Anithasri A Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Governemnt Villupuram Medical College, Villupuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Karthikeyan G Assistant Professor, Department of General Medicine, Government Ramanathapuram Medical College & Hospital, Ramanathapuram, Tamil Nadu, India.
Keywords: Online Teaching, Traditional Teaching, Critical Thinking Skills, Social Interaction

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 pandemic has created thelargest disruption in education systems in history. Numerous medical institutions have shifted to online teaching with the hope to reduce viral transmission.

Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of online teaching and traditional teaching in the domains of collaborative learning, critical thinking skills and social interaction and to describe the advantages and difficulties faced in online learning by MBBS students.

Materials and Methods: Anonline-based cross-sectional study was conducted fromMay 2021 to August 2021 in a private medical college in Salem district of Tamil Nadu, India. Among the 600 MBBS students attending online classes from the first year to final year MBBS, 574 students consented tothe study through mail and were studied using a semi-structured questionnaire prepared in Google form and sent through mail. Descriptive analysis was done and the association between the categorical variables were tested using chi-square test.

Results: Traditional way of teaching was perceived to improve the critical thinking skills (p <0.0006), social interaction skills (p<0.044) and collaborative learning (p <0.01) more than online teaching. Advantages of online teaching identified were comfortable learning environment (38%) easier for slow learners (19%), learning at their own pace (18%) etc. Difficulties faced in online teaching were technical difficulties (62%), lack of self-motivation (61%), time management (56%) etc.

Conclusion: Challenges faced by the students need to be identified earlier and Governments/educational institutions can focus more on removing the barriers to connectivity.

How to cite this article:
Praveena Daya A, Premapriya G, Anithasri A, Karthikeyan G. A Comparative Study of Perception of Online Teaching Versus Traditional Teaching among MBBS Students during COVID Crisis. Special Issue - COVID-19 & Other Communicable Disease. 2022;3-8.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24321/0019.5138.202201

Author Biographies

Prema Priya G, Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vinayaka Missions Kirupanandavariyar Medical College and Hospital, VMRF (DU), Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.

Associate Professor

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,

Vinayaka Missions Kirupanandavariyar Medical College

Salem, Tamilnadu, India

Anithasri A, Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Governemnt Villupuram Medical College, Villupuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Assistant Professor

Department of Biochemistry

Governemnt Villupuram Medical College

Villupuram, Chennai

Karthikeyan G, Assistant Professor, Department of General Medicine, Government Ramanathapuram Medical College & Hospital, Ramanathapuram, Tamil Nadu, India.

Assistant Professor

Dept of General Medicine

Government Ramanathapuram Medical College & Hospital

References

United Nations [Internet].Policy brief: education during COVID-19 and beyond;2020[cited 2021 May

. Available from:https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/wp-content/uploads/sites/22/2020/08/sg_

policy_brief_covid-19_and_education_august_2020.pdf

National Statistics Office, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation[Internet]. Household social

consumption on education in India; 2017-2018[cited 2021 May 7]. Available from: http://mospi.nic.in/sites/

default/files/publication_reports/Report_585_75th_round_Education_final_1507_0.pdf

United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs[Internet]. World urbanization prospects – the

revision; 2019;[cited 2021 May 10]. Available from: https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/

Files/WUP2018-Report.pdf

Dost S, Hossain A, Shehab M, Abdelwahed A, Al-Nusair L. Perceptions of medical students towards online

teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national cross-sectional survey of 2721 UK medical students.

BMJ Open. 2020 Nov;10(11). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Collaborative Learning, Center for Teaching Innovation [Internet]. Cornell University, New York: 2021[cited

April 5]. Available from: https://teaching.cornell.edu/teaching-resources/engaging-students/

collaborative-learning

Ni AY. Comparing the effectiveness of classroom and online learning: teaching research methods. J Public

AffEduc. 2013;19:199-215. [Google Scholar]

Bettinger EP, Fox L, Loeb S, Taylor ES. Virtual classrooms: how online college courses affect student success. Am Econ Rev. 2017;107:2855-75. [Google Scholar]

Almendingen K, Morseth MS, Gjølstad E, Brevik A, Tørris C. Student’s experiences with online teaching following COVID-19 lockdown: amixed methods explorative study. PLoS One. 2021 Aug;16(8):e0250378.[PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Subramanian A, Timberlake M, Mittakanti H, Lara M, Brandt ML. Novel educational approach for medical

students: improved retention rates using interactive medical software compared with traditional lecturebased

format. J SurgEduc. 2012 Jul-Aug;69:253-6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Nalini GK, Deepak P, Neelamma P, Sahana GN, Nagaral JV. Effectiveness of digital learning versus traditionallearning among undergraduate students-prescription writing. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2020;10:9-14. [Google Scholar]

Lew EK, Nordquist EK. Asynchronous learning: student utilization out of sync with their preference. Med Educ

Online. 2016 Jun;21:30587.[PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Zhang Z, Ran P, Peng Y, Hu R, Yan W. Effectiveness of e-learning in public health education: apilot study.

Int J InfEducTechnol. 2015;5:577-81. [Google Scholar]

Nguyen T. The effectiveness of online learning: beyond no significant difference and future horizons. MERLOT J Online Learning Teach. 2015;11:309-19. [Google Scholar]

Garrison DR, Vaughan ND. Blended learning in higher education: framework, principles, and guidelines.

New York: John Wiley and Sons;2007. p.9-11. [Google Scholar]

Dodiya D, Vadasmiya DS, Diwan J. A comparative study of flip classroom teaching method versus traditional

classroom teaching method in undergraduate medical students in physiology. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol.

;9:551-5. [Google Scholar]

Terrell SR, Dringus L. An investigation of the effect of learning style on student success in online learning

environment. J EducTechnolSyst. 2000;28:231-8. [Google Scholar]

Omar ND, Hassan H, Atan H. Student engagement in online learning: learnersattitude toward e-mentoring.

ProcediaSocBehavSci. 2012;67:464-75. [Google Scholar]

Johnson SD, Aragon SR, Shaik N, Palma-Rivas N. Comparative analysis of learner satisfaction and

learning outcomes in online and face-to-face learning environments. J Interact Learn Res. 2000;11:29-49.

[Google Scholar]

Academic Medicine Collection [Internet]. COVID-19 and medical education; 2020 [cited 2021 Sep 21]. Available

from: https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/pages/collectiondetails.aspx?TopicalCollectionId=68

Wiley Online Library [Internet]. Medical Education. COVID-19 relevant information; 2020 [cited 2021 Sep

. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/toc/10.1002/(ISSN)1365-2923.covid.vi

Published
2022-03-15