Community Perception for Mass Drug Administration Towards Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis: A Study in Jharkhand

  • Sagya Shrivastava Singh Radha Govind University, Ramgarh, Jharkhand.
  • Avtar Singh Manhas Radha Govind University, Ramgarh, Jharkhand.
  • Ganesh Kumar Yadav National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme, Jharkhand.
  • S N Sharma Ex National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme, Delhi.
  • P K Srivastava
Keywords: Coverage, Drug Compliance, Lymphatic Filariasis, Mass Drug Administration

Abstract

Introduction: Jharkhand conducts annual mass drug administration (MDA) with diethylcarbamazine citrate (DEC) and albendazole to combat lymphatic filariasis (LF), achieving over 85% coverage in ten rounds. However, no district meets the antigenemia target during Transmission Assessment Surveys (TAS). Independent assessments reveal subop- timal compliance, attributed to unsupervised drug distribution. This study aims to qualitatively explore community perspectives on MDA, compliance factors, reported side-effects, and community awareness of LF and MDA’s objectives, seeking insights to enhance the program’s effectiveness in LF elimination.
Methods: Two districts in the state were randomly chosen, and from each community health centre (CHC) within these districts, villages were randomly selected. In these chosen villages, 10% of the population participated in the survey after providing written informed consent. The compiled and analyzed data showed that 1,394 individuals were interviewed, representing a total eligible population of 14,675 across both districts.

Results: The drug compliance rate showed that over 75% of the pop- ulation in both districts took drugs, albeit inconsistently across MDA rounds. In Ramgarh, 359 respondents (84.21%) consumed drugs during MDA, with 191 (44.74%) in one round, 146 (34.21%) in two rounds, and 22 (5.26%) in three or more rounds. In Deoghar, 768 respondents (79.38%) consumed drugs, with 183 (23.82%) in one round, 193 (25.12%) in two rounds, and 392 (51.02%) in three or more rounds.
Conclusion: The study analysed the sources of awareness, reasons for non-compliance, and management of drug-related adverse events. It identified gaps in awareness generation and highlighted key areas requiring focused attention. The article suggests providing incentives to motivate service providers and drug administrators, fostering healthy competition to achieve desired drug compliance during MDA.

How to cite this article:
Singh S S, Manhas A S, Yadav G K, Sharma S
N, Srivastava P K. Community Perception for
Mass Drug Administration Towards Elimination
of Lymphatic Filariasis: A Study in Jharkhand. J
Commun Dis. 2024;56(1):184-191.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24321/0019.5138.202424

References

Ottesen EA, Duke BO, Karam M, Behbehani K. Strate- gies and tools for the control/elimination of lymphatic

filariasis. Bull World Health Organ. 1997;75(6):491-503. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme. Operational guidelines on elimination of lymphatic filariasis, India. Directorate of National Vector Borne Disease Control; 2005.

National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme. Guidelines on elimination of lymphatic filariasis, India.

Directorate of National Vector Borne Disease Control; 2009.

Thomas L [Internet]. Systematic sampling. A step-by- step guide with examples. Scribbr; 2020 [cited 2024

Feb 22]. Available from: from https://www.scribbr. com/methodology/systematic-sampling

Dhariwal AC, Srivastava PK, Bhattacharjee J. Elimination of lymphatic filariasis in India: an update. J Indian Med Assoc. 2015;113(12):189-90. [Google Scholar]

Lahariya C, Mishra A. Strengthening of mass drug ad- ministration implementation is required to eliminate

lymphatic filariasis from India: an evaluation study. J Vector Borne Dis. 2008;45(4):313-20. [PubMed] [Goog-

le Scholar]

Singh S, Kulkarni N, Khanna VN, Sinha PK, Kumar S. Mass drug administration with triple drug therapy for elimination of lymphatic filariasis - first exposure in Simdega, a tribal district of Jharkhand, India. J Med

Arthropodol Public Health. 2021;1(1):79-91. [Google Scholar]

Mukhopadhyay AK, Patnaik SK, Satya Babu P, Rao KN. Knowledge on lymphatic filariasis and mass drug administration (MDA) programme in filaria endemic districts of Andhra Pradesh, India. J Vector Borne Dis. 2008;45(1):73-5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Aswathy S, Beteena K, Leelamoni K. Mass drug ad- ministration against filariasis in India: perceptions

and practices in a rural community in Kerala. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2009;103(7):617-24. [PubMed]

[Google Scholar]

Srivastava PK, Dhariwal AC, Bhattacharjee J. Status of lymphatic filariasis in India. Health Action. 2013:19.

Srivastava PK, Bhattacharjee J, Dhariwal AC, Kr-ishnamoorthy K, Dash AP. Elimination of lymphatic filariasis – current status and way ahead. J Commun Dis. 2014;46(2):85-94. [Google Scholar]

World Health Organization. Monitoring and epidemiological assessment of Mass Drug Administration. A

manual for National elimination programmes. WHO/ HIM/NTD/PCT/2011.4. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.

Srivastava PK, Sharma SN, Bhattacharjee J, Dhariwal AC, Krishnamoorthy K. A tool for monitoring epidemi- ological impact of Mass Drug Administration (MDA) in the elimination of lymphatic filariasis - an Indian

experience. J Commun Dis. 2014;46(2):1-6. [Google Scholar]

Vaishnav KG, Patel IC. Independent assessment of Mass Drug Administration in filariasis affected Surat city. J Commun Dis. 2006;38(2):149-54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Showkath Ali MK, Rajendran R, Regu K, Mohanan MK, Dhariwal AC, Lal S. Study on the factors affecting

the MDA programme in Kerala state. J Commun Dis. 2007;39(1):51-6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Showkath Ali MK, Regu K, Rajendran R, Mohanan MK, Ganesh B. Awareness of health personnel about lymphatic filariasis and mass drug administration in Kerala state. J Commun Dis. 2008;40(1):37-40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Srivastava PK, Dhillon GP. Elimination of lymphatic filariasis in India--a successful endeavour. J Indian Med Assoc. 2008;106(10):673-4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Published
2024-03-30