Fractional Extraction, Isolation and Identification of Biologically Active Compounds from Anamirta cocculus (L.) Wight & Arn to Control Culex quinquefasciatus Say and Aedes albopictus Skuse

  • Anju Viswan K Biopesticides & Toxicology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Calicut, Malappuram, Kerala, India. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7926-5826
  • E Pushapalatha Biopesticides & Toxicology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Calicut, Malappuram, Kerala, India.
  • S Arivudainambi Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • T Selvamuthukumaran Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu, India.
Keywords: Anamirta Cocculus, Aedes albopictus, Culex quinquefasciatus, Larvicidal Activity, NMR, LCMS

Abstract

Background & Objectives: Development of resistance towards synthetic insecticides is one of the major problems in vector control programmes and it can be reduced to an extent by the alternate use of botanical or bio insecticides. The present study aims to find out the larvicidal activities of Anamirta cocculus (L.) Wight and Arn against Culex quinqueafsciatus Say and Aedes albopictus Skuse and to isolate the most active compounds present in the active fraction of the plant extract.

Methods: Cold extracts of A. cocculus seeds were taken using methanol as solvent and fractionation was done using the solvents n-hexane, ethyl acetate and acetone by column chromatographic method. Bioassays were conducted using all these extracts and LC50 were calculated using the probit analysis developed by Finney. The structural elucidation of the compounds of most active fraction isolated from chromatographic studies after bioassay was done by Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LCMS) and Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy.

Result: A. cocculus treated larvae exhibited more restlessness, convulsions and sluggishness, and the restless activity is more in Ae. albopictus than in Cx. quinquefasciatus. The activity of column fractions of A. cocculus was in the order Hexane (H) > Acetone (A) > H:EA (3:1) >H:EA (2:1)> H:EA (1:1): Ethyl acetate (EA): H:EA (1:2) >H:EA (1:3). The compounds present in the most active fractions were Picrotin and Menispermine respectively.

Interpretation & Conclusion: From the results it has been proved that the plant is having potential larvicidal activity.

How to cite this article:
Anju Viswan K, Pushapalatha E, Arivudainambi S, Selvamuthukumaran T. Fractional Extraction, Isolation and Identification of Biologically Active Compounds from Anamirta cocculus (L.) Wight & Arn to Control Culex quinquefasciatus Say and Aedes albopictus Skuse. J Commun Dis 2020; 52(3): 53-57.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24321/0019.5138.202031

References

Tehri K, Singh N. The role of botanicals as green pesticides in integrated mosquito management: A

review. Int J Mosq Res 2015; 2(1): 18-23.

Shaalan EAS, Canyonb D, Younesc MWF et al. A review of botanical phytochemicals with mosquitocidal

potential. Environ Int 2005; 3: 1149-1166.

Shivakumar MS, Srinivasan R, Natarajan D. Larvicidal potential of some Indian medicinal plant extracts

against Aedes aegypti (L.) Asian J Pharm clin Res 2013; 6(3): 77-80.

Ezeonu FC, Chidume GI, Udedi SC. Insecticidal properties of volatile extracts of orange peels. Bioresour Technol 2001; 76(3): 273-274.

Carlini CR, Grossi-De-Sá MF. Plant toxic proteins with insecticidal properties. A review on their potentialities

as bioinsecticides. Toxicon 2002; 40(11): 1515-1539.

World Health Organization. Instruction for determining the susceptibility or resistance of mosquito larvae to

insecticide. 1981. Available form: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/69615.

Finney DJ. Probit Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 1971.

Sagar SK, Sehgal SS. Toxicity of neem seed coat extract against mosquitoes. Indian J Ent 1997; 59(2): 215-223.

Goel G, Makkar HP, Francis G et al. Phorbol esters: structure, biological activity, and toxicity in animals.

Int J Toxicol 2007; 26: 279-288.

Ghosh A, Chowdhury N, Chandra G. Plant extracts as potential mosquito larvicides. Indian J Med Res 2012;

(5): 581-598.

Pushpalatha E, Najeeba MB, Santhini KP. Anamirta cocculus L. (Wight & Arn), Pogostemon paniculatus(Wild) Benth, Culex pipiens. International Journal of Applied Biology and Pharmaceutical Technology 2014;

(3): 159-162.

Pushpalatha E, Aiswarya D, Sharihan EK et al. Reproductve toxicity of Anamirta cocculus (L.) Wight

and Arn and Sphagneticola trilobata (L.) Pruski extracts on Culex pipiens (L.) Diptera, Culicidae. Prospects in

Bioscience: Addressing the Issues 2012; 389-392.

Satya V, Paridhavi M. Ethano-botanical, phytochemical and pharmacological review of Anamirta cocculus

(Linn.) Wight and Arn. Int J Rev Life Sci 2012; 2(1): 1-6.

Jijith US, Sudhakaran Nair CR, Ajithkumar KC et al. Phytochemistry and Pharmacology of Anamirta

cocculus Wild. J Pharmacogn Phytochem 2016; 8(2): 90-92.

Published
2020-10-01