Development and Content Validation of Perceived Barriers to Exercise Questionnaire (PBEQ-I) for Indian Office Workers

  • Sougata Panda PhD Scholar, Department of Physiotherapy, Jayoti Vidyapeeth Women’s University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • Ankit Bhargava Dean & Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, Jayoti Vidyapeeth Women’s University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
  • Amarjeet Singh Former Professor & Head, Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
  • Seveka Bali Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Physical & Rehabilitation Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Keywords: Barriers, Exercise, Physical Activity, Questionnaire, Content Validity

Abstract

Background: Physical inactivity worldwide is a major challenge in preventing various non-communicable diseases. In India, physical inactivity is observed in the average population, mostly in office workers involved with sitting or clerical jobs. Studies showed that there are different barriers, facilitators, and preferences for exercises that already exist for office workers. To our knowledge, no questionnaire currently addresses perceived barriers to exercise among Indian office workers.

Objective: To measure self-reported perceived barriers to exercise for the employees working in the office.

Methodology: This study has two essential components: domain and item development and content validation using the online Delphi method. The questionnaire was validated using the Content Validity Index (CVI) and modified Kappa, the most used quantitative method for calculating content validity. The questionnaire was validated by a panel of 13 experts in two rounds of validation.

Results: The initial testing revealed low content validity for individual items (I-CVI range: 0.50 to 1.00) and moderate agreement (Kappa range: 0.27 to 1). After modifying and replacing items, the second round achieved acceptable scores (CVI: 0.85-1 and Kappa: 0.84-1). The final instrument had five domains and twenty-five questions. The domains were as follows: (1) personal barrier; (2) professional barrier; (3) social and family barrier; (4) preferences; and (5) knowledge barrier domain.

Conclusions: Using an iterative methodology, the validation of the perceived barriers to exercise questionnaire (PBEQ-I) for Indian office workers revealed a high level of item-content validity for assessing the perceived barriers to exercise among office employees. Further reliability testing is required to validate this instrument’s psychometric qualities.

How to cite this article:
Panda S, Singh A, Bali3 S, Bhargava A. Development and Content Validation of Perceived Barriers
to Exercise Questionnaire (PBEQ-I) for Indian Office Workers. Chettinad Health City Med J. 2023;12(2):33-40.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24321/2278.2044.202325

Author Biographies

Sougata Panda, PhD Scholar, Department of Physiotherapy, Jayoti Vidyapeeth Women’s University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

PhD Scholar. 

 

Ankit Bhargava, Dean & Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, Jayoti Vidyapeeth Women’s University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

 

Dean & professor,  Department Of Physiotherapy, Jayoti Vidyapeeth Women’s University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

 

 

 

Amarjeet Singh, Former Professor & Head, Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.

 

Former Professor & Head, Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical   Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.

 

 

Seveka Bali, Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Physical & Rehabilitation Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.

 

Division of physiotherapy, Department of Physical & Rehabilitation Medicine,

  Post Graduate Institute of Medical   Education & Research (PGIMER),

 Chandigarh,   ,India.

 

 

References

De Oliveira LS, Souza EC, Rodrigues RA, Fett CA, Piva AB. The effects of physical activity on anxiety, depression, and quality of life in elderly people living in the community. Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2019;41(1):36-42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Zanuso S, Jimenez A, Pugliese G, Corigliano G, Balducci S. Exercise for the management of type 2 diabetes: a review of the evidence. Acta Diabetol. 2010;47(1):15-22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ôunpuu S, Dans T, Avezum A, Lanas F, McQueen M, Budaj A, Pais P, Varigos J, Lisheng L; INTERHEART Study Investigators. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet. 2004;364:937-52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Hu FB. Sedentary lifestyle and risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Lipids. 2003;38:103-8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Chau JY, van der Ploeg HP, Merom D, Chey T, Bauman AE. Cross-sectional associations between occupational and leisure-time sitting, physical activity and obesity in working adults. Prev Med. 2012;54:195-200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Walsh NP, Gleeson M, Shephard RJ, Gleeson M, Woods JA, Bishop NC, Fleshner M, Green C, Pedersen BK, Hoffman-Goetz L, Rogers CJ, Northoff H, Abbasi A, Simon P. Position statement. Part one: immune function and exercise. Exerc Immunol Rev. 2011;17:6-63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Bali S, Dayal D, Sood AP, Panda S, Gupta P. The relationship between weight status, vital signs and physical fitness in children with simple obesity: a cross-sectional observational study. Int J Disabil Sport Heal Sci. 2022;5:106-12. [Google Scholar]

Martin SA, Pence BD, Woods JA. Exercise and respiratory tract viral infections. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2009;37:157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Panda S, Bali S, Gugnani A, Singh A. Knowledge of osteoporosis among women in a low- to middle-income country: literature review and recommendations. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med. 2022;34:55-65. [Google Scholar]

Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT; Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012;380:219-29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Sharma NK, Gupta A, Prabhakar S, Singh R, Sharma S, Anand A. Single nucleotide polymorphism and serum levels of VEGFR2 are associated with age related macular degeneration. Curr Neurovasc Res. 2012;9:256-65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Biddle SJ, Bennie JA, Bauman AE, Chau JY, Dunstan D, Owen N, Stamatakis E, van Uffelen JG. Too much sitting and all-cause mortality: is there a causal link? BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 26;16:635. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Prince SA, Saunders TJ, Gresty K, Reid RD. A comparison of the effectiveness of physical activity and sedentary behaviour interventions in reducing sedentary time in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. Obes Rev. 2014;15:905-19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Ojo SO, Bailey DP, Hewson DJ, Chater AM. Perceived barriers and facilitators to breaking up sitting time among desk-based office workers: a qualitative investigation using the TDF and COM-B. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 14;16(16):2903. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Hadgraft NT, Healy GN, Owen N, Winkler EA, Lynch BM, Sethi P, Eakin EG, Moodie M, LaMontagne AD, Wiesner G, Willenberg L, Duntan DW. Office workers’ objectively assessed total and prolonged sitting time: individual-level correlates and worksite variations. Prev Med Rep. 2016;4:184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Lee CN, Lam SC, Tsang AY, Ng BT, Leung JC, Chong AC. Preliminary investigation on prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia: should we tune our focus on healthy adults? Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2015;12:232-48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Crombie IK, Irvine L, Williams B, McGinnis AR, Slane PW, Alder EM, McMurdo ME. Why older people do not participate in leisure time physical activity: a survey of activity levels, beliefs and deterrents. Age Ageing. 2004;33:287-92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Andajani-Sutjahjo S, Ball K, Warren N, Inglis V, Crawford D. Perceived personal, social and environmental barriers to weight maintenance among young women: a community survey. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2004 Oct 5;1(1):15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Trost SG, Owen N, Bauman AE, Sallis JF, Brown W. Correlates of adults’ participation in physical activity: review and update. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:1996-2001. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Anjali, Sabharwal M. Perceived barriers of young adults for participation in physical activity. Curr Res Nutr Food Sci. 2018;6:437-49. [Google Scholar]

Booth ML, Bauman A, Owen N, Gore CJ. Physical activity preferences, preferred sources of assistance, and perceived barriers to increased activity among physically inactive Australians. Prev Med. 1997;26:131-7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Brawley LR, Rejeski WJ, King AC. Promoting physical activity for older adults: the challenges for changing behavior. Am J Prev Med. 2003;25:172-83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Grossman MD, Stewart AL. ‘You aren’t going to get better by just sitting around’: physical activity perceptions, motivations, and barriers in adults 75 years of age or older. Am J Geriatr Cardiol. 2003;12:33-7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Shaikh AA, Dandekar SP. Perceived benefits and barriers to exercise among physically active and non-active elderly people. Disabil CBR Incl Dev. 2019;30:83. [Google Scholar]

Tariq M, Hayati KS. Perceived barriers of physical activity among Kospen community in Putrajaya. Int J Public Health Clin Sci. 2018;5(6):332-44. [Google Scholar]

Arzu D, Tuzun EH, Eker L. Perceived barriers to physical activity in university students. J Sports Sci Med. 2006;5(4):615-20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Nooijen CF, Kallings LV, Blom V, Ekblom O, Forsell Y, Ekblom MM. Common perceived barriers and facilitators for reducing sedentary behaviour among office workers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:792. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Satija A, Khandpur N, Satija S, Gaiha SM, Prabhakaran D, Reddy KS, Arora M, Narayan KM. Physical activity among adolescents in India: a qualitative study of barriers and enablers. Health Educ Behav. 2018;45:926-34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Mariam AA, Mazin H. Working experience and perceived physical activity and exercise barriers. Sport Mont. 2019;17:47-52. [Google Scholar]

Lovell GP, Ansari WE, Parker JK. Perceived exercise benefits and barriers of non-exercising female university students in the United Kingdom. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010;7:784-98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Hassan F, Ibrahim RH. Women’s perception about the benefits and barriers to exercise. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2021;15(9):2677-82.

Muzindutsi PF, Nishimwe-Niyimbanira R, Sekhampu TJ. Perceived benefits and barriers to physical exercise: a comparative analysis of first year and senior students at a South African University. Afr J Phys Health Educ Recreat Dance. 2014;20:169-81. [Google Scholar]

Chandra A, Nongkynrih B. Facilitators and barriers of physical activity in prevention and control of NCD – a qualitative study in North India. J Trop Med Health. 2019;3:144. [Google Scholar]

O’Neill K, Reid G. Perceived barriers to physical activity by older adults. Can J Public Health. 1991;82:392-6. [PubMed]

Sechrist KR, Walker SN, Pender NJ. Development and psychometric evaluation of the exercise benefits/barriers scale. Res Nurs Health. 1987;10:357-65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Kgokong D, Parker R. Physical activity in physiotherapy students: levels of physical activity and perceived benefits and barriers to exercise. S Afr J Physiother. 2020;76:1399. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Zhu W, Timm G, Ainsworth B. Rasch calibration and optimal categorization of an instrument measuring women’s exercise perseverance and barriers. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2001;72:104-16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Jun NJ, Kamarudin KS, Ali A, Zakaria NS. Motivators and barriers of physical activity among private office workers in Selangor. Malays J Med Health Sci. 2020;16:58-65. [Google Scholar]

Ball K, Crawford D, Owen N. Too fat to exercise? Obesity as a barrier to physical activity. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2000;24:331-33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Atlantis E, Barnes EH, Ball K. Weight status and perception barriers to healthy physical activity and diet behavior. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008;32:343-52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Ishii K, Inoue S, Ohya Y, Odagiri Y, Takamiya T, Suijo K, Owen N, Shimomitsu T. Sociodemographic variation in the perception of barriers to exercise among Japanese adults. J Epidemiol. 2009;19:161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Reichert FF, Barros AJ, Domingues MR, Hallal PC. The role of perceived personal barriers to engagement in leisure-time physical activity. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:515-9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Stein KF, Sargent JT, Rafaels N. Intervention research: establishing fidelity of the independent variable in nursing clinical trials. Nurs Res. 2007;56:54-62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Armstrong TS, Cohen MZ, Eriksen L, Cleeland C. Content validity of self-report measurement instruments: an illustration from the development of the Brain Tumor Module of the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2005;32:669-76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Zamanzadeh V, Ghahramanian A, Rassouli M, Abbaszadeh A, Alavi-Majd H, Nikanfar AR. Design and implementation content validity study: development of an instrument for measuring patient-centered communication. J Caring Sci. 2015;4:165-78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Benson J, Clark F. A guide for instrument development and validation. Am J Occup Ther. 1982;36:789-800. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Wynd CA, Schmidt B, Schaefer MA. Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. West J Nurs Res. 2003;25:508-18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Stone DH. Design a questionnaire. BMJ. 1993;307:1264. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Carmines EG, Zeller RA. Reliability and validity assessment. Sage Publications; 1979. [Google Scholar]

Saw SM, Ng TP. The design and assessment of questionnaires in clinical research. Singapore Med J. 2001;42:131-5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Vasudevan V, Rimmer JH, Kviz F. Development of the barriers to physical activity questionnaire for people with mobility impairments. Disabil Health J. 2015;8:547-56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35:382-5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Yusoff MS. ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Educ Med J. 2019;11:49-54. [Google Scholar]

Cicchetti DV, Sparrow SA. Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. Am J Ment Defic. 1981;86:127-37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Faria CD, Teixeira-Salmela LF, Nadeau S. Clinical testing of an innovative tool for the assessment of biomechanical strategies: the Timed “Up and Go” Assessment of Biomechanical Strategies (TUG-ABS) for individuals with stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45:241-7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Faria CD, Teixeira-Salmela LF, Nadeau S. Development and validation of an innovative tool for the assessment of biomechanical strategies: the Timed ‘Up and Go’ - Assessment of Biomechanical Strategies (TUG-ABS) for individuals with stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45:232-40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29:489-97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Gadotti IC, Vieira ER, Magee DJ. Importância e esclarecimento das propriedades de medida em reabilitação. Braz J Phys Ther. 2006;10:137-46. Portugese. [Google Scholar]

Grant JS, Davis LL. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Res Nurs Health. 1997 Jun;20(3):269-74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30:459-67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Published
2023-06-30